June is LGBT pride month, which essentially means there will
be a month long drought of rainbow décor and glitter in craft stores everywhere
that will make the California water shortage look like Waterworld. And they
certainly have something to celebrate: gaybugs have made immense amounts of
progress in the last year, really within the last few months, given that the
majority of states that had bans on gay marriage were challenged and the bans
were overturned. It would appear that the scales have finally tipped in favor
of the human rights movement, though the progress treads dangerously close to
the borderline, and the percentages of proponents and opponents are sometimes varied
by a few points. Public opinion obviously shifts depending on where you stand
in the hemispheres of America, as seen in this unpleasant video on ABC's WhatWould You Do. There are still those who think it’s a sin, there are still those
who think it’s disgusting. Most importantly, there are still those who think it’s
a choice with a cure.
Conversion Therapy, once known as Gay Aversion Therapy, has
lost popularity in mainstream mental health services gradually since homosexuality
was eliminated as a mental disorder in the DSM in 1973. Prior to that, aversion
therapies ranged from talk therapy and prayer to catatonia-inducing medications,
shock treatment, and even lobotomies. Being gay was viewed as an unnatural diversion
from the evolutionary, biological, spiritual, and moral norm; a disease that
must be treated and cured alongside polio and leprosy. But even as early as the
1920s, individuals were starting to recognize the folly in this belief. One
being Sigmund Freud, who was never really a particular favorite of mine, but
scored bonus points with me when I uncovered this quote about conversion: “’in general to undertake to convert a
fully developed homosexual into a heterosexual does not offer much more
prospect of success than the reverse.’ Success meant making heterosexual
feeling possible, not eliminating homosexual feelings.” And so many of
these therapies focused on the latter; shock that was administered in pairings
with “inappropriate visual stimuli”, if successful, only created a negative
association to homosexual feelings. Heterosexual feelings were never fostered,
and most “cured” gays were expected to live the life of a celibate or fake
orgasms with their heterosexual partners. Documentaries focusing on these
so-called ex-gays usually depicted men with plastered smiles on their faces,
perched on a couch next to their wife, holding a bouncing baby, and seething
with self-hatred and distaste for life. Some of these men eventually “regressed”
back to their homosexual lifestyles once they found self-acceptance.
But these issues were from decades and even
centuries ago, right? We’re no longer plagued with such ignorance. The American
Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Association
of Marriage and Family Therapists, the American Medical Association have all
unanimously spoken out against the practice of gay conversion therapies citing
the damage that it can create and the principal of the Hippocratic Oath: Do No
Harm. Conversion therapy feeds into guilt and shame, which causes depression
and suicidal ideations. So why is it that only recently some states are
beginning to adopt bans against this harmful treatment?
Just one year ago in 2013, Governor Jerry Brown
determined that it was illegal for mental health providers to administer
conversion therapy to minors identifying as LGBT given that many of them were
being forced into treatment by overzealous parents. New Jersey has a similar
law, which means no more straightening camps, no more trivial therapy sessions,
and no more private lashings (sadly, this does not apply to religious
organizations such as pastors or priests, who are not licensed mental health
professionals and always seem to think they can do whatever the hell they want
anyways). Illinois is on its way to passing a conversion ban, as was New York,
but unfortunately, ongoing passage of these protective legislations has hit obstacles.
As New
York prepared passage, they were stalled because these so called ex-gays
ventured out to a few meet and greets with law makers, trying to perpetuate the
image that there is nothing wrong with degrading and denying your true self.
Though I can’t call it a surprise, Texas has also jumped on the bandwagon as
earlier this week the Republic party unveiled its anti-gay platform. In
addition to claims of gays being the devil and “tearing at the fabric of
society,” they argued that they “recognize the legitimacy and value of
counseling which offers reparative therapy and treatment to patients who are
seeking escape from the homosexual lifestyle. No laws or executive orders shall
be imposed to limit or restrict access to this type of therapy.” Likewise, in
spite of the excess of medical and mental health associations noted above who are against conversion, and
being one of the first states to ban conversion therapy for minors, the
California Association of Marriage Therapists took a subtle stance against bans
as well. While acknowledging that there is nothing wrong with being gay, CAMFT
refused to go so far as to speak out against conversion therapy, stating, “CAMFT acknowledges that
current cultural prejudice about same-sex sexual orientation compels some
clients to seek out sexual orientation change due to personal, family, or
religious conflicts, or to better fit into some cultural and religious norms[…] CAMFT advises mental health
professionals that do provide assistance to those who seek sexual orientation
change, to do so by utilizing affirmative multi-culturally competent and
client-centered approaches that recognize the negative impact of social stigma
on sexual minorities and balance ethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence
(sic), justice, and respect for people’s rights and dignity.”
So yes, we know that being gay causes distress in
homosexual individuals. They are constantly faced with adversity,
discrimination, bullying, humiliation, and weekly if not daily reminders that
their lifestyle is not moral, that they are Hell-bound, that they are dirty and
second-class citizens. They are not afforded the same protections and rights as
heterosexuals. They have been beaten, they have been shamed, they have been
spit on and knocked down. But in what other circumstance would a mental health
professional tell someone to change themselves to reduce stress from an outside
source? “So your husband berates and beats you? Well let’s teach you how to
stop being annoying and getting in his way.” “Oh your mom’s an alcoholic and it
bothers you? Well, we’ll teach you to be a better child so she will stop
drinking.” “Someone called you the N-word and burned a cross in your front yard?
Well let’s start painting your skin white, and then no one will bother you.” “Oh
it’s hard to be gay in today’s society? Well then, let’s straighten you out!” The
responsibility of change needs to shift away from the client and out into the world.
The cornerstones of therapy are self-efficacy, self-esteem,
and self-acceptance. When a gay child is distressed or depressed, it is not
reflective of some innate internal struggle. It is the crushing dissonance this
world has implanted in their small minds. And it grows with them; it consumes
them. It is the mental health professional’s responsibility to challenge and
destroy these distortions, to strengthen the client, to stand against social
stigmas. As a lesbian, I can tell you, being gay is not a walk in paradise, and
yes, life got hard, but I got stronger to survive it. I can’t and won’t be fixed;
I’m not broken. As a mental health professional, I can tell you it’s not my job
to fix anyone else who’s not broken either.
No comments:
Post a Comment